| Branch | U.S. Air Force |
| Series | AFI |
| Publication date | 2019-07-31 (7.1 years ago) |
| Status | Current |
| Proponent / OPR | SAF/IE |
| Source of record | AF e-Publishing |
Download PDF Official document (AF e-Publishing)
This instruction provides the procedural guidelines and reporting structure needed to execute the Mission Sustainment Program. The program preserves and protects military readiness by mitigating or preventing current and potential risks caused by hazards within the Installation Complex and Mission Footprint.
This document includes both substantive and administrative revisions to the original AFI 90-2001, Encroachment Management Program, dated 03 September 2014. It establishes a risk reporting framework for cross-functional teams at the installation, Major Command (MAJCOM), and headquarters level. Recommended team composition is similar to the original AFI, but this instruction requires direct involvement from operational staff to ensure that mission-related hazards are accounted for and proactively addressed. It also introduces a shareable hazard and control reporting process (Mission Sustainment Risk Report) that consolidates existing encroachment information (e.g., Installation Complex Encroachment Management Action Plans (ICEMAP)) with new risk analyses. Some key terms are modified to emphasize mission relevance. For instance, encroachment management is now mission sustainment, encroachment challenges are mission sustainment hazards, and management actions are controls. This updated policy also aligns mission sustainment with the Air Force risk management model described in AFI 90-802, Risk Management and Air Force Pamphlet 90-803, Risk Management Guidelines and Tools
Publications state their own changes on page 1 — behind a PDF the official host will not serve to a search engine. This is that section, verbatim. It describes the edition above, not every historical change.
These Code of Federal Regulations references appear in AFI 90-2001 but are not in the current CFR — checked against the eCFR structure API. A part can vanish because it was removed or reorganised, and some references are simply mistyped in the source publication. Either way the pointer is dead: verify before relying on it, and check every publication affected.
| Functional community | Publications | Which ones |
|---|---|---|
| Operations | 1 | DAFI 10-2501 AFGSC Sup |
1 publication in 1 other community depend on this one, which Inspections & Special Management owns. Each community inspects its own publications; a dependency that crosses communities is owned by nobody, which is why this list normally does not exist anywhere. Built from the publications' own citations, so it reflects what we have read.
If AFI 90-2001 changes, these are the documents that point at it. Extracted from the publications' own text, so it reflects what we have read, not a complete dependency map. Every publishing office validates its own document; nobody validates the seams between them.
Records in this branch carrying the same series and number — interim changes, guidance memoranda, and unit supplements. A copy stamped with one of these is a different document from the base publication.