| Branch | U.S. Air Force |
| Series | AFMAN |
| Publication date | 2020-06-25 (6.2 years ago) |
| Status | Current |
| Proponent / OPR | AF/A5 |
| Source of record | AF e-Publishing |
Download PDF Official document (AF e-Publishing)
This publication has been changed to an AFMAN. It has been substantially revised and requires a complete review in its entirety. This revision adds procedures for generating training munitions requirements, allowing Air Force Material Command (AFMC) test coded aircrews to maintain basic mission proficiency. It clarifies how AF/A5RW prioritizes munitions when inventories are not 100% supportable and incorporates organization changes at the Global Ammunitions Control Point (GACP). It provides additional clarification to the mid-year and end - of-year expenditure reports processes and changes priority for munitions allo cations to better align with current requirements. Finally, two attachments from the previous edition have been removed. This manual provides guidance and responsibilities to Air Force aircrew munitions requirements. This instruction is applicable to all Air Force, ANG and AF Reserve units who authorize, allocate, expend, or manage aircrew munitions. Major Commands (MAJCOMs) may supplement this AFMAN as required. MAJCOMs should coordinate any supplements with AF/A5RW and ACC/A3TW to ensure overall compliance with this AFMAN. Supplementary guidance must not contradict the parent publication
Publications state their own changes on page 1 — behind a PDF the official host will not serve to a search engine. This is that section, verbatim. It describes the edition above, not every historical change.
| Functional community | Publications | Which ones |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | 1 | AFMAN 21-206 USAFE-AFAFRICA Sup |
1 publication in 1 other community depend on this one, which Flying Operations owns. Each community inspects its own publications; a dependency that crosses communities is owned by nobody, which is why this list normally does not exist anywhere. Built from the publications' own citations, so it reflects what we have read.
If AFMAN 11-212 changes, these are the documents that point at it. Extracted from the publications' own text, so it reflects what we have read, not a complete dependency map. Every publishing office validates its own document; nobody validates the seams between them.