| Branch | U.S. Air Force |
| Series | AFI |
| Publication date | 2020-08-07 (6.1 years ago) |
| Status | Current |
| Proponent / OPR | AF/SG |
| Source of record | AF e-Publishing |
Download PDF Official document (AF e-Publishing)
This publication establishes instructions for the documentation and administrative management of Airmen with medical conditions that may impact their ability to perform their military duty. These procedures have been developed to ensure maximum utilization and readiness of personnel, while preserving their health and minimizing risk of further injury or illness. This publication describes appropriate courses of action for the Disability Evaluation System (DES) and Air Reserve Component (ARC) -specific non duty-related disability evaluation system (NDR-DES) pre-screening disposition when individuals have medical conditions potentially affecting their continued fitness for military service or deployability in the AF, as outlined by the standards per AFI 48-123, Medical Examinations and Standards.
This document has been substantially revised and must be completely reviewed. It replaces AFI 10-203, Duty Limi ting Conditions. Major changes include the inclusion of Airman availability management processes and the inclusion of Airmen medical readiness optimization (AMRO)
Publications state their own changes on page 1 — behind a PDF the official host will not serve to a search engine. This is that section, verbatim. It describes the edition above, not every historical change.
| Functional community | Publications | Which ones |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | 4 | ANGI 36-101, DAFMAN 36-2100, DAFI 36-2903, DAFMAN 36-2136 |
4 publications in 1 other community depend on this one, which Aerospace Medicine owns. Each community inspects its own publications; a dependency that crosses communities is owned by nobody, which is why this list normally does not exist anywhere. Built from the publications' own citations, so it reflects what we have read.
If AFI 48-133 changes, these are the documents that point at it. Extracted from the publications' own text, so it reflects what we have read, not a complete dependency map. Every publishing office validates its own document; nobody validates the seams between them.